Common wisdom across the Blogosphere is that you should be blogging. All the time. If you’re not creating reams of content regularly, then your readers are going to desert you, RSS subscribers will throw in the towel and the search engine spiders will retreat to less dusty corners of the web.
This is of course, rubbish. Because guess what? You really shouldn’t be blogging.
Why You Shouldn’t Be Blogging
Of course, I’m not suggesting that you shut down your blog, uninstall WordPress and sell your domain name. But blogging when you have good reason not to can do you more harm than good.
Content Isn’t King
Every single piece of SEO advice you’ve ever read has told you that content is king. Every single piece of SEO advice you’ve ever read has missed the point.
Not all content is created equal, and not all content has a claim to the throne. Good Quality Content is the key to your readers’ hearts, and what the search engines want to see. If you’re not providing that, then in all honesty, you probably shouldn’t bother.
There Is Such Thing As A Valid Excuse
You might not ever have admitted this to yourself. It might be a huge leap for you. But it’s OK. We’ll do it together. Deep breaths. Are you ready? On three. One…
Two…
Three. There will always be times when you just can’t face putting a post together, and that is not an issue.
See, that’s not so scary, is it? Whether you’re stressed out with paid work, have pressing family issues, or just want to curl up on the couch with a kitten and a glass of whisky, there are always things that’ll be more important than your blog. So do them. And once you’ve cleared your mind, you can approach your blog with fresh ideas. What you don’t want to do is try and power through…
Your Readers Deserve Better
… because your readers will notice. They’ll see that you’re not putting out work of your normal high standards. And then one of two things will happen.
If you’ve been using Twitter properly, then you’ll have a core of readers from your niche who’ll spot something’s not up and offer their advice and assistance. They might even send you a guest post or two to tide you over.
However, most of your readers – the ones who just read your efforts without getting involved – will decide that they’re bored. And if they’re bored, they won’t read.
And the search engines won’t be impressed either. Sure, so long as you’re not scraping and stealing, you won’t be hit with any penalties. But if you’re not producing good content, people won’t link to you. And that’s not doing your SEO any good.
So do yourself a favour. Know when you shouldn’t be blogging, and don’t blog. Take some time off, recharge your batteries, and come back strong. Just don’t draw attention to your hiatus with a post that’s a thinly veiled attempt to provide an excuse for your absence.
When Andy’s not making excuses for not updating UT in three weeks, he’s writing for The FirstFound Blog, procrastinating on Twitter or writing the odd guest post here and there. Share your best excuses in the comments thread.





















8 comments
Ralph Ferrett says:
Apr 27, 2010
I guess it can be a difficult thing to get this right, spesh if your blog is specialist topic.
If find personally if there are too many blogs from the same one am actually *less* likely to read them. I kinda like my blog reading to be a salad as it were, I subscribe to lots of different types.
When my feed readers has three or four, all from the same blog, in a couple of days, then the truth is I am quite likely to only skim them.
.-= Ralph Ferrett´s last blog ..Football needs “socio” fan ownership. =-.
Andrew says:
Apr 28, 2010
I know what you mean Ralph – I’ve unsubscribed from a few blogs that employ scattergun tactics. What you really need to ask is “can I consistently put up an insightful and helpful post every day?”
For most part-time bloggers, the answer is most probably no.
Toni Anicic says:
Apr 28, 2010
Trying to be controversial Andy, are you?
I agree with most of the points you’ve made. It basically all comes down to knowing *why* are you blogging instead of blogging because someone told you you should do it.
Every blog post can’t be a winner, but it’s up to a blogger to decide what kind of blogger he/she will be – will he/she blog about everything that comes up to his/her mind or will the blogger only write when he/she has something really smart to say. The readership of the blog will be different in these really different blogging strategies.
.-= Toni Anicic´s last blog ..We are the Facebook, you will be assimilated! =-.
uberVU - social comments says:
Apr 28, 2010
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mr603: Finally – a new post from Unmemorable Title. You Really SHOULDN’T Be Blogging. http://ow.ly/1DSct…
Tom Albrighton says:
Apr 28, 2010
This needed saying. Cranking out the content for its own sake is totally counter-productive. You’re basically treating your readers in the same way you treat GoogleBot – attempting to bait them with inferior content.
I think it helps to consider the blog as a whole, not just the latest post. In other words, think about the totality of the content available and how it adds value in combination.
I try to make at least some of my posts enduringly interesting, so the blog has sustainable interest. That means careful writing and rewriting, plus some original research. If you just force out a post every day willy-nilly, you’ll soon be looking at a vast array of forgettable, flimsy content.
I also find that the will to blog blows hot and cold. When I’m in the mood, I try to store ‘em up for rainy days. You don’t have to post your stuff right away.
.-= Tom Albrighton´s last blog ..Companies should be themselves in social media =-.
Rowena says:
Apr 28, 2010
Ah, panic-stricken, web-stat-junkies who blog for the sake of blogging. Consider: “Does my blog show the world how great I am, or how mediocre?”
On a related note, however, I’ve heard plenty of discussion about whether blogging is on the decline, thanks to micro-blogging sites such as Twitter. Why write a long post about a topic when you can make a quick, smart (well, possibly) comment about it in 140 characters?
.-= Rowena´s last blog ..Lazy journalism =-.
Andrew says:
Apr 28, 2010
@Toni
Me, being controversial for controversy’s sake? As If I’d stoop to such levels just to start a debate! Saying that, it’d help if I didn’t take a stance everyone agrees with.
@Tom
My rainy day file is huge. Problem is that I never seem to find the inspiration to complete one of my “nearly done” posts to put out.
@Rowena
I can’t see Twitter replacing blogging. You can’t say a lot in 140 characters, let alone defend a standpoint or float a new idea.
Rowena says:
Apr 28, 2010
I certainly don’t think it will replace blogging, but it may contribute towards a trend of people blogging less frequently. The easy option.
.-= Rowena´s last blog ..Lazy journalism =-.